A trout that was still alive was allegedly used as a sex toy by the couple in the contentious video. The wife was allegedly lying on a boat in the water when the husband was overheard saying, “That’s how you catch a trout!”. .
The wife was a former worker of a veterinary clinic in Tasmania, the facility said in response. The clinic’s spokesman stated:.
An ex-worker of the [vet] hospital has recently drawn attention after appearing in a video that has gone viral on social media, it has recently come to my attention. “.
The clinic expressed regret for any distress the video may have caused and vowed to firmly oppose any disrespectful or abusive treatment of animals.
“Please be aware that this person is no longer a paid employee… My entire staff and I strongly condemn any issue involving the disrespect or mistreatment of animals. “.
The video shocked and outraged viewers on social media. Many people said that they needed “brain and eye bleach” to erase the vision in their comments. .
The CEO of the RSPCA, Jan Davis, told The Mercury that the situation was a “serious concern” and that the group would avoid it.
According to reports, the Tasmanian couple appeared in a different clip before the controversial trout fish movie. In Cressy, Northern Tasmania’s St Mark’s Anglican Cemetery, they were observed acting inappropriately on top of a grave.
An investigation led to the discovery of the grave, which belonged to the late Tasmanian artist David Hammond Chapman who passed away in Cressy in 1983. .
Reddit users watched the video a lot, and there were a lot of comments there expressing disgust and contempt. .
The fish video was posted on social media, and as comments kept coming in, the Tasmanian police urged users to remove it immediately.
“Police are aware of a graphic video featuring two people and a fish that is circulating. They have a specific area of investigation that they are looking into. The video should be deleted right away, according to police. “.
Officials from the police department claim that it is now unlawful to possess or distribute the movie. Additionally, they mentioned that this case is the subject of an ongoing legal investigation.
